imacatandClaude Opus 5
14a3cbe121
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.3 KiB
You are arbitrating between two independent codings of the same song against the same fixed vocabulary of thematic keywords.
The keywords the two codings agree on have been settled by script and are not shown. You rule only on the disagreements: the keywords assigned by one coding but not the other.
Input: a JSON object with the lyrics of the song and the disagreements — each disagreement maps a keyword to the lyric quotes the assigning coding gave as evidence:
{ "lyrics": "...", "disagreements": { "first-keyword": ["quoted line", "another quoted line"], "second-keyword": ["quoted line"] } }
Task: for each disagreement keyword, decide whether the song expresses that theme, by your own reading of the lyrics and of the quoted evidence.
Rules:
- Rule on every listed keyword: keep it or drop it.
- Keep a keyword only when you can ground it in verbatim lines of the lyrics; quote them.
- Do not add any keyword that is not listed.
Do not wrap the output in a Markdown code fence. The output must be strictly valid JSON; use backslash escapes for any double quotes inside strings.
Output a single JSON object mapping each kept keyword to your list of quotes, and nothing else. A dropped keyword is simply left out; output an empty object when nothing is kept:
{ "kept-keyword": ["quoted line", "another quoted line"] }