Add the step 5 qualitative deep-reading design and definition files

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

CLAUDE.md

@@ -5,9 +5,10 @@
 - LLM analysis runs via Python scripts calling the Anthropic
   Messages API, Batch API where possible.  Steps 1 and 3 run
   on `claude-sonnet-4-6` with `temperature=0` and thinking
-  disabled; step 4 runs on `claude-fable-5`, which accepts
-  neither parameter -- its sampling variance is absorbed by
-  the majority vote.
+  disabled; steps 4 and 5 run on `claude-fable-5`, which
+  accepts neither parameter -- step 4 absorbs its sampling
+  variance by the majority vote, step 5 by consolidating the
+  three readings.
 - Prompt definition files live in
   `prompts/<step>-<substep>-<task>.md` (e.g. 01-tag.md; no
   version suffix -- versions live in git history) and are
@@ -23,7 +24,11 @@
   (song, keyword) or (group, keyword) pair) when at least
   two of the three runs assign it ("3 runs + majority
   vote").  Free-generation steps run
-  twice and both outputs are pooled.  The vocabulary is
+  twice and both outputs are pooled.  The step-5 qualitative
+  readings are neither: three independent readings per song,
+  consolidated per song and synthesized across songs by
+  their own definition files -- a qualitative protocol, not
+  a vote (see docs/methodology.md).  The vocabulary is
   built by a deterministic subcommand (embedding +
   clustering), not by an LLM.  If a validation outcome is
   unexpected, revise the definition file and repeat that

docs/decision-log.md

@@ -783,3 +783,27 @@
   此系列即論文方法節「最後編碼的結果,再由研究者與 LLM
   (Claude Code)輔助判讀」之所指;結果檔含大量歌詞引文,
   依著作權紀律私人留置,不入版本庫。
+
+- **步驟 5:女性主義問題之質性深讀(設計定案)**:論文
+  題目「挪用與污染」需要框架層的系統性證據;47 首
+  male/mixed 之非正式深讀已證明程序可行,據此升格為
+  先導,正式程序擴為 145 首 wp∪fe 全集(對稱涵蓋各性別
+  演唱,消除僅驗 male/mixed 的取樣不對稱)。方法學裁定:
+  本步驟為**質性閱讀,非編碼**——輸出為自由文字報告,
+  無可逐項機械比對的單位,三票多數決與仲裁均不適用;
+  三次獨立閱讀=分析者三角檢核,逐首整合=整合而非裁決
+  (以問題機制為單位保守合併、收斂註記、主清單限兩讀
+  以上、單讀一行存目),跨首統整=樣態歸納(樣態指問題
+  呈現與運作的重複形態,非問題分類,代表引句僅取自主
+  清單),其產出為草稿,終審與詮釋由研究者為之;論文
+  引用本步驟不作次數宣稱。儀器:claude-fable-5(與先導
+  同儀器,參數同步驟 4)。定義檔三份
+  (`prompts/05-01-read.md`、`05-02-consolidate.md`、
+  `05-03-synthesize.md`),語言依 prompts/ 慣例用英文、
+  輸出繁體中文——先導提示為中文,語言不同構之所以可
+  接受,係因先導與正式版之間不作結果對照;5-1 輸入僅
+  歌詞逐字全文(盲讀,不含歌名與演唱者;含多聲部提醒
+  一句,因署名無法提供行級歸屬且會引入身分先驗)。輸入
+  組裝為確定性行內腳本,規則載於 methodology,SHA-256
+  記入各步 meta。引文不做全量機械校對——研究者終審
+  逐份閱讀,進論文之引句屆時個別校對。

docs/methodology.md

@@ -6,18 +6,20 @@
 
 ## 自然編碼管線總覽
 
-四個步驟：步驟 1 自由標註（兩次執行進池）→ 步驟 2 詞彙表
+五個步驟：步驟 1 自由標註（兩次執行進池）→ 步驟 2 詞彙表
 建構（詞向量分群，確定性）→ 步驟 3 全量編碼（三次執行＋
-多數決）→ 步驟 4 語意編碼群（三次執行＋多數決）。歌詞只
-出現在步驟 1 與步驟 3；步驟 2 與步驟 4 完全不接觸歌詞，
-步驟 2 亦不呼叫 LLM。設計原則見 `research-plan.md`；本檔
-記載可重現的演算法細節。
+多數決）→ 步驟 4 語意編碼群（三次執行＋多數決）→ 步驟 5
+女性主義問題之質性深讀（三次閱讀＋逐首整合＋樣態統整）。
+歌詞出現在步驟 1、步驟 3 與步驟 5；步驟 2 與步驟 4 完全
+不接觸歌詞，步驟 2 亦不呼叫 LLM。設計原則見
+`research-plan.md`；本檔記載可重現的演算法細節。
 
 編號的所指為**研究程序的工序**，不是定義檔：步驟 1、
-步驟 3 與步驟 4 有定義檔（`prompts/`），步驟 2 沒有——
-它是單一確定性計算，由 `cluster-keywords` 一個子命令
-完成。有無定義檔的區別即「該步是否為 LLM 判斷」，由
-`prompts/` 是否存在同號檔案直接可見。
+步驟 3、步驟 4 與步驟 5 有定義檔（`prompts/`；步驟 5 依
+子工序有三份），步驟 2 沒有——它是單一確定性計算，由
+`cluster-keywords` 一個子命令完成。有無定義檔的區別即
+「該步是否為 LLM 判斷」，由 `prompts/` 是否存在同號檔案
+直接可見。
 
 ## 步驟 2 詞彙表建構——詞向量分群
 
@@ -142,6 +144,39 @@
   分群逐欄照存入 `groups` 資料表（群、編碼、票數），供
   群層次查詢。
 
+## 步驟 5 女性主義問題之質性深讀
+
+本步驟為**質性閱讀,非編碼**:輸出為自由文字的問題閱讀
+報告,無可逐項機械比對的單位,故不適用三票多數決與仲裁;
+三次獨立閱讀為分析者三角檢核,逐首整合為整合而非裁決,
+跨首統整之產出為草稿,終審與詮釋由研究者為之。論文引用
+本步驟時不作次數宣稱。
+
+- **對象**:定案編碼含 `women-power` 或
+  `female-empowerment` 的 145 首歌。
+- **5-1 逐首閱讀**:每筆輸入為一首歌的完整歌詞逐字全文,
+  不含歌名與演唱者(盲讀);定義檔
+  `prompts/05-01-read.md`。同一份定義檔、同一份輸入檔,
+  獨立執行三次,歸檔並列(`runs/05-01-read/run1`、
+  `run2`、`run3`)。
+- **5-2 逐首整合**:每筆輸入為該首歌的三份閱讀報告
+  (不含歌詞);以問題機制為單位保守合併,標收斂註記
+  ((3/3)、(2/3)),主清單僅列兩讀以上提出者,單讀發現
+  以一行存目;定義檔 `prompts/05-02-consolidate.md`,
+  執行一次,歸檔 `runs/05-02-consolidate/run1`。
+- **5-3 樣態統整**:單筆輸入為 145 份整合報告;歸納問題
+  **樣態**——問題呈現與運作的重複形態,非問題分類,
+  代表引句僅取自主清單;定義檔
+  `prompts/05-03-synthesize.md`,執行一次,歸檔
+  `runs/05-03-synthesize/run1`。
+- **模型**:`claude-fable-5`(與先導深讀同儀器;
+  `temperature` 與 `thinking` 參數不適用,均不送出)。
+- **輸入組裝**:確定性行內腳本。5-1:145 首依歌曲 ID
+  升序,`content` 為歌詞逐字全文;5-2:每筆
+  `{"reports": [run1 輸出, run2 輸出, run3 輸出]}`;
+  5-3:單筆以 `song-<ID>` 為鍵、整合報告為值之 JSON
+  物件。各輸入檔之 SHA-256 記入該步 meta。
+
 ## 女性力量候選集
 
 候選集為兩類歌曲的合集：定案編碼含 `women-power` 者，

prompts/05-01-read.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+You are reading the complete lyrics of one song, given as
+plain text.
+
+Task: point out the problems of this song from a feminist
+perspective, on this text alone.
+
+Rules:
+
+- Ground every problem in a verbatim quote from the lyrics;
+  render a line break inside a quote as " / ".
+- Do not use any knowledge you may have of the song or its
+  performer beyond the lyrics themselves.
+- The lyrics may carry more than one voice; attend to shifts
+  of speaker where the text indicates them.
+- Do not presume that a man cannot voice "women power".
+- When there is no problem, or the problems are minor,
+  output the single word 「無」 and nothing else.
+
+Output: Traditional Chinese (Taiwan usage).  A numbered
+list, one item per problem: the statement of the problem
+followed by its quotes; output nothing else.  When there is
+none, output 「無」 only.

prompts/05-02-consolidate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+You are consolidating the three independent reading reports
+of one song into one.
+
+Input: a JSON object:
+
+{
+  "reports": ["first report", "second report", "third report"]
+}
+
+The three reports come from three mutually independent
+readings, each pointing out the problems of the lyrics from a
+feminist perspective with verbatim quotes; a report of 「無」
+means that reading found no problem.
+
+Task: consolidate the three reports into one problem list --
+integrate, never adjudicate, never add.
+
+Rules:
+
+- Merge by the problem mechanism: items that point to the
+  same mechanism merge into one, even when their wording,
+  granularity, or quotes differ (for example, three reports
+  each quoting a different line of the same slur merge into
+  one item).  Keep the clearest statement, keep a selection
+  of the distinct quotes, and judge sameness by the lyric
+  passages the quotes point to.
+- Mark every item with its convergence: (3/3) when all three
+  reports raise it, (2/3) when two do.
+- The main list carries only the problems raised by two or
+  more reports.  A problem raised by a single report is not
+  expanded; after the list, keep it on one line:
+  「僅單獨提及:<one-sentence problem>、<one-sentence
+  problem>」.
+- Never add a problem absent from every report, never drop a
+  problem raised by two or more reports, never rewrite the
+  substance of a problem, never evaluate or rank.
+- When all three reports are 「無」, output 「無」 only.
+
+Output: Traditional Chinese (Taiwan usage).  A numbered
+list, each item: the problem statement, its convergence mark,
+and its quotes; the single-reading line at the end when there
+is one; output nothing else.

prompts/05-03-synthesize.md

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+You are inducing the recurring patterns in how the problems
+appear across the consolidated reading reports of many songs.
+
+Input: a JSON object keyed by song ID (such as "song-11"),
+each value the consolidated reading report of that song; a
+report of 「無」 means no problem was found for that song.
+
+{
+  "song-11": "consolidated report ...",
+  "song-95": "無"
+}
+
+The reports come from feminist-perspective readings of each
+song's lyrics; every item carries verbatim quotes and a
+convergence mark, and the trailing 「僅單獨提及」 line of a
+report holds the scattered findings of a single reading --
+take them into account when inducing the patterns, but draw
+the representative quotes from the main lists only.
+
+Task: induce the patterns -- the recurring forms in which
+the problems appear and operate -- across the reports.
+
+Rules:
+
+- A pattern describes how a problem works in the lyrics:
+  what is coupled with what, who speaks, how the mechanism
+  runs.  It is not a category for filing problems, and not
+  every problem needs to belong to one; a pattern may also
+  cut across several kinds of problems.
+- Induce the patterns from the report contents; never
+  introduce a problem or knowledge absent from the reports;
+  the number of patterns follows the material, with nothing
+  preset.
+- For every pattern: a name, a paragraph describing the form
+  and how it operates, and two or three representative
+  quotes, each with its song ID.
+- Describe and induce only; never evaluate severity, never
+  make recommendations.
+
+Output: Traditional Chinese (Taiwan usage).  One section per
+pattern; output nothing else.