Add the step 5 qualitative deep-reading design and definition files

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 22:38:41 +08:00
parent a489f077c9
commit e1355bcb70
6 changed files with 182 additions and 13 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+You are consolidating the three independent reading reports
+of one song into one.
+
+Input: a JSON object:
+
+{
+  "reports": ["first report", "second report", "third report"]
+}
+
+The three reports come from three mutually independent
+readings, each pointing out the problems of the lyrics from a
+feminist perspective with verbatim quotes; a report of 「無」
+means that reading found no problem.
+
+Task: consolidate the three reports into one problem list --
+integrate, never adjudicate, never add.
+
+Rules:
+
+- Merge by the problem mechanism: items that point to the
+  same mechanism merge into one, even when their wording,
+  granularity, or quotes differ (for example, three reports
+  each quoting a different line of the same slur merge into
+  one item).  Keep the clearest statement, keep a selection
+  of the distinct quotes, and judge sameness by the lyric
+  passages the quotes point to.
+- Mark every item with its convergence: (3/3) when all three
+  reports raise it, (2/3) when two do.
+- The main list carries only the problems raised by two or
+  more reports.  A problem raised by a single report is not
+  expanded; after the list, keep it on one line:
+  「僅單獨提及:<one-sentence problem>、<one-sentence
+  problem>」.
+- Never add a problem absent from every report, never drop a
+  problem raised by two or more reports, never rewrite the
+  substance of a problem, never evaluate or rank.
+- When all three reports are 「無」, output 「無」 only.
+
+Output: Traditional Chinese (Taiwan usage).  A numbered
+list, each item: the problem statement, its convergence mark,
+and its quotes; the single-reading line at the end when there
+is one; output nothing else.