Gather the runs and the results under data/
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
3b5d468a0a
commit
dc369b9b1e
75 files changed
+10
-7
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"script_version": "run_llm.py 3.1.0",
|
||||
"model": "claude-fable-5",
|
||||
"temperature": null,
|
||||
"thinking": null,
|
||||
"max_tokens": 32000,
|
||||
"prompt_path": "../prompts/05-03-synthesize.md",
|
||||
"prompt_sha256": "90ed14f43153fd8184929e80315d660ca8516466bffa857e669bb2985829a365",
|
||||
"input_path": "instance/llm-input-synthesize-female.jsonl",
|
||||
"input_sha256": "e63c401dfce3dd3de1969afda2b2db46a55e2ac57c70eb2b4259b12f564c01f2",
|
||||
"item_count": 1,
|
||||
"dry_run": false,
|
||||
"started_at": "2026-08-15T17:15:39+08:00",
|
||||
"batch": {
|
||||
"batch_id": "msgbatch_017tfhiRTnaxqCp6YFyoivsu",
|
||||
"submitted_at": "2026-08-15T17:15:39+08:00",
|
||||
"ended_at": "2026-08-15T09:19:21.041833+00:00"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"usage": {
|
||||
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 0,
|
||||
"cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
|
||||
"input_tokens": 60727,
|
||||
"output_tokens": 8519
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
{"id": "synthesis", "text": "## 模式一:厭女詞彙的雙向流通——自稱與攻擊共用同一套貶稱\n\n大量報告呈現同一種語言機制:女性敘事者以「bitch」「hoes」「ho」等根源於貶低女性的詞彙,同時用於自我命名(常以「賦權」「挪用」姿態出現)與攻擊其他女性。由於同一詞彙在文本內兼作自誇與罵詞,其貶義功能持續運作,挪用的翻轉意涵被抵銷;即使全數出自女性之口,仍再生產「以侮辱女性的字眼定義女性」的語言結構,並使該詞彙常態化。\n\n- 「Said, lil bitch, you can't fuck with me if you wanted to」(song-122)\n- 「Bought matching diamonds for six of my bitches」(song-283)\n- 「I ain't got time for you fake-ass hoes」(song-338)\n\n## 模式二:陰性即侮辱、陽剛即力量的語言階序\n\n多份報告指出一種對稱的修辭:一方面以女性性器或陰柔特質(「pussy」「sissy」「bitch」)作為「懦弱、低劣」的罵詞,另一方面以男性身體符碼與陽剛資格(陰莖尺寸、「夠不夠男人」、big dick energy)作為力量與人格價值的度量。無論罵的是男是女,這套語言都預設「陰性=可鄙、陽剛=權力」,女性敘事者展現強悍時也須借用男性符碼命名自身力量。\n\n- 「If you a pussy, you get popped, you a groupie, you a opp」(song-122)\n- 「And you might think I'm weak without a sword / But if I had one, it'd be bigger than yours」(song-523)\n- 「You ain't the man, you ain't a man (you ain't nothin' but a)」(song-586)\n\n## 模式三:以男性為戰利品的女性敵對競爭\n\n跨越極多首歌的核心情節:女性之間的關係被框定為圍繞男性注意力、慾望與佔有的零和較勁——以「搶走妳的男人」「他有女友仍求見我」作為炫耀與羞辱手段,把男性當作女性互鬥的獎品與計分工具,並常升級為對其他女性的肢體暴力威脅展演;自我賦權建立在其他女性的失敗、恐懼與從屬之上,而非任何連帶。\n\n- 「Your baby daddy fuckin' me and suckin' me / He don't answer you, bitch, that's because of me」(song-338)\n- 「He got a girl, but he keep beggin' to see me」(song-521)\n- 「Slappin' rap bitches and makin' bail, ho」(song-758)\n\n## 模式四:男性過錯的責任轉嫁至女性\n\n當敘事涉及男性的背叛或失格,怒火與究責常偏移到女性身上:指向「第三者」、對方的新歡、母親姊妹等親屬,甚至內化為敘事者的自我懷疑;真正該負責的男性則在敘事中隱身、免責,形成「女人怪罪女人」「女人替男人的錯自責」的結構。\n\n- 「He only want me when I'm not there / He better call Becky with the good hair」(song-71)\n- 「I choose to blame your mom」(song-828)\n- 「You got me lookin' in the mirror different / Thinkin' I'm flawed because you inconsistent」(song-244)\n\n## 模式五:性—資源交易腳本\n\n性與親密關係被明碼標價為與男性金錢的交換:以性魅力換取名牌、學費、供養,以男方財力作為交往前提與篩選標準。即使以女性主動、掌控的口吻呈現,文本仍複製「男性出錢、女性以性回報」的性別化交易結構,把女性身體價值錨定在男性購買力上,而非挑戰這套交換邏輯。\n\n- 「Pay my tuition just to kiss me on this wet-ass pussy」(song-388)\n- 「If your ass a broke nigga, hell nah, I can't date ya / If your ass a rich nigga, I'ma fuck ya 'til you ain't one」(song-338)\n- 「We ain't even speakin' if the nigga ain't spendin'」(song-521)\n\n## 模式六:消費化的賦權——以財富與奢侈品界定自主與尊重\n\n「賦權」「獨立」「療癒」被窄化為消費能力與排場符號:快樂等同購物、尊重繫於金飾財力、姊妹情誼以餽贈名牌維繫。這種論述具階級排他性,將女性自主收編進市場邏輯,對不具此經濟條件的女性形成排除,也未觸及結構性的平等。\n\n- 「Whoever said money can't solve your problems / Must not have had enough money to solve 'em」(song-283)\n- 「What's that icy thang hangin' 'round my neck? / That's gold, show me some respect」(song-62)\n- 「Got me steppin' out that Jeep got Manolo's」(song-483)\n\n## 模式七:身體的部位化與商品化自我物化\n\n女性(含敘事者自身)被拆解為可檢視、評分、品嚐的部位與規格清單:胸、腰、臀的比例評比,以食物、飲品、貴金屬、玩偶等消費品自況,把「可被觀看、可被取用」當作價值來源。即使以第一人稱自信口吻發聲,仍複製將人化約為可估價客體的凝視邏輯。\n\n- 「Body crazy, curvy, wavy, big titties, lil' waist」(song-504)\n- 「It's giving hair, face, ass, titties (Woo, aye, ugh, yeah)」(song-838)\n- 「And once you get a tasteLine truncated
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
You are inducing the recurring patterns in how the problems
|
||||
appear across the consolidated reading reports of many songs.
|
||||
|
||||
Input: a JSON object keyed by song ID (such as "song-11"),
|
||||
each value the consolidated reading report of that song; a
|
||||
report of 「無」 means no problem was found for that song.
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
"song-11": "consolidated report ...",
|
||||
"song-95": "無"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
The reports come from feminist-perspective readings of each
|
||||
song's lyrics; every item carries verbatim quotes and a
|
||||
convergence mark, and the trailing 「僅單獨提及」 line of a
|
||||
report holds the scattered findings of a single reading --
|
||||
take them into account when inducing the patterns, but draw
|
||||
the representative quotes from the main lists only.
|
||||
|
||||
Task: induce the patterns -- the recurring forms in which
|
||||
the problems appear and operate -- across the reports.
|
||||
|
||||
Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- A pattern describes how a problem works in the lyrics:
|
||||
what is coupled with what, who speaks, how the mechanism
|
||||
runs. It is not a category for filing problems, and not
|
||||
every problem needs to belong to one; a pattern may also
|
||||
cut across several kinds of problems.
|
||||
- Induce the patterns from the report contents; never
|
||||
introduce a problem or knowledge absent from the reports;
|
||||
the number of patterns follows the material, with nothing
|
||||
preset.
|
||||
- For every pattern: a name, a paragraph describing the form
|
||||
and how it operates, and two or three representative
|
||||
quotes, each with its song ID.
|
||||
- Describe and induce only; never evaluate severity, never
|
||||
make recommendations.
|
||||
|
||||
Output: Traditional Chinese (Taiwan usage). One section per
|
||||
pattern; output nothing else.
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user